Americas vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use

Americas
170,529 TJ
in 2023
Kazakhstan, Republic of
45,474 TJ
in 2023
Americas rank
4th
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
8th

Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use over time

  • Americas
  • Kazakhstan, Republic of
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020062023

How they compare

Americas currently reports 170,529 TJ against 45,474 TJ in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 125,055 TJ.

That makes Americas's figure about 3.7 times Kazakhstan, Republic of's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Americas has been ahead every year.

Americas ranks 4th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 8th of 12 groups.

Americas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas Kazakhstan, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 249,128 TJ 53,714 TJ 195,414 TJ Americas
2010s 216,796 TJ 53,380 TJ 163,416 TJ Americas
2020s 172,656 TJ 75,140 TJ 97,516 TJ Americas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production β€” energy use, Americas or Kazakhstan, Republic of?
Americas, at 170,529 TJ against 45,474 TJ in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production β€” energy use between Americas and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
125,055 TJ, with Americas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Americas and Kazakhstan, Republic of rank globally for pre- and post-production β€” energy use?
Americas ranks 4th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 8th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Americas vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/americas/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/americas/kazakhstan/">Americas vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
154 places, 4,105 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.