Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal)

Australia
15,938 TJ
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
105,822 TJ
in 2023
Australia rank
17th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 105,822 TJ against 15,938 TJ in Australia, a difference of 89,884 TJ.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.6 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 17th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 120 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 33,816 TJ 4,247 TJ 29,569 TJ Australia
2000s 29,959 TJ 19,862 TJ 10,097 TJ Australia
2010s 21,372 TJ 76,454 TJ 55,083 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 16,564 TJ 121,942 TJ 105,378 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — energy use, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 105,822 TJ against 15,938 TJ in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — energy use between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
89,884 TJ, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for pre- and post-production — energy use?
Australia ranks 17th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pre- and post-production — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pre- and post-production — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
154 places, 4,105 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.