Which has higher pre- and post-production — energy use, Chile or Eswatini?

Chile, at 3,150 TJ against 3,014 TJ in Eswatini as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Eswatini: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal)

Chile

3,150 TJ

in 2023

Eswatini

3,014 TJ

in 2023

Chile rank

34th

Eswatini rank

35th

Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal) over time

Chile
Eswatini

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3,150 TJ against 3,014 TJ in Eswatini, a difference of 136 TJ.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Chile ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 35th of 120 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1990s	226.76 TJ	1,917 TJ	1,691 TJ	Eswatini
2000s	206.52 TJ	1,756 TJ	1,550 TJ	Eswatini
2010s	3,185 TJ	2,240 TJ	945.38 TJ	Chile
2020s	3,352 TJ	2,567 TJ	785.39 TJ	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — energy use, Chile or Eswatini?: Chile, at 3,150 TJ against 3,014 TJ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — energy use between Chile and Eswatini?: 136 TJ, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for pre- and post-production — energy use?: Chile ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 35th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-coal/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit: TJ
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 154 places, 4,105 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.