Which has higher pre- and post-production — energy use, Malta or Namibia?

Namibia, at 2,105 TJ against 2,010 TJ in Malta as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Namibia: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Total)

Malta

2,010 TJ

in 2023

Namibia

2,105 TJ

in 2023

Malta rank

145th

Namibia rank

144th

Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Total) over time

Malta
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 2,105 TJ against 2,010 TJ in Malta, a difference of 95 TJ.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 145th and Namibia ranks 144th of 207 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	937.87 TJ	935.7 TJ	2.17 TJ	Malta
2010s	1,633 TJ	1,561 TJ	71.71 TJ	Malta
2020s	1,904 TJ	2,144 TJ	240.18 TJ	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — energy use, Malta or Namibia?: Namibia, at 2,105 TJ against 2,010 TJ in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — energy use between Malta and Namibia?: 95 TJ, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for pre- and post-production — energy use?: Malta ranks 145th and Namibia ranks 144th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-total/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-total/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Pre- and post-production — Energy Use (Total)
Unit: TJ
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 241 places, 7,819 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.