Serbia, Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use

Serbia, Republic of
34,973 TJ
in 2023
Zimbabwe
32,518 TJ
in 2023
Serbia, Republic of rank
65th
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use over time

  • Serbia, Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Serbia, Republic of currently reports 34,973 TJ against 32,518 TJ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,455 TJ.

That makes Serbia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Serbia, Republic of ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 186 countries.

Serbia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia, Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 25,864 TJ 12,266 TJ 13,597 TJ Serbia, Republic of
2010s 37,082 TJ 8,674 TJ 28,408 TJ Serbia, Republic of
2020s 33,953 TJ 20,538 TJ 13,415 TJ Serbia, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production β€” energy use, Serbia, Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Serbia, Republic of, at 34,973 TJ against 32,518 TJ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production β€” energy use between Serbia, Republic of and Zimbabwe?
2,455 TJ, with Serbia, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia, Republic of and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia, Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for pre- and post-production β€” energy use?
Serbia, Republic of ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia, Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-total/serbia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-energy-use-total/serbia/zimbabwe/">Serbia, Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production β€” Energy Use (Total)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 7,819 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.