Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita

Pakistan
0.7156 tonnes per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0.7891 tonnes per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
168th
Papua New Guinea rank
166th

Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • Pakistan
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.81194619852024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.7891 tonnes per person against 0.7156 tonnes per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0735 tonnes per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 168th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 213 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1950s 0.1962 tonnes per person 0.0627 tonnes per person 0.1335 tonnes per person Pakistan
1960s 0.312 tonnes per person 0.1434 tonnes per person 0.1686 tonnes per person Pakistan
1970s 0.3254 tonnes per person 0.4926 tonnes per person 0.1672 tonnes per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.4616 tonnes per person 0.5948 tonnes per person 0.1332 tonnes per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.6254 tonnes per person 0.5198 tonnes per person 0.1056 tonnes per person Pakistan
2000s 0.7271 tonnes per person 0.7073 tonnes per person 0.0198 tonnes per person Pakistan
2010s 0.7748 tonnes per person 0.6915 tonnes per person 0.0833 tonnes per person Pakistan
2020s 0.8549 tonnes per person 0.8025 tonnes per person 0.0524 tonnes per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher territorial vs. consumption-based co₂ emissions per capita, Pakistan or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.7891 tonnes per person against 0.7156 tonnes per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in territorial vs. consumption-based co₂ emissions per capita between Pakistan and Papua New Guinea?
0.0735 tonnes per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Papua New Guinea?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for territorial vs. consumption-based co₂ emissions per capita?
Pakistan ranks 168th and Papua New Guinea ranks 166th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/prod-cons-co2-per-capita/pakistan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/prod-cons-co2-per-capita/pakistan/papua-new-guinea/">Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Territorial vs. consumption-based CO₂ emissions per capita
Unit
tonnes per person
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
213 places, 22,945 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from burning fossil fuels and industrial processes. This includes emissions from transport, electricity generation, and heating, but not land-use change.