Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local
Malaysia
100.0%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
100.0%
in 2024
Malaysia rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 74 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 88.0% | 12.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.