Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 11.64 % change on previous year against 2.02 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 9.62 % change on previous year.
That makes Namibia's figure about 5.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.61 % change on previous year | -2.58 % change on previous year | 5.19 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 1.89 % change on previous year | -0.7837 % change on previous year | 2.68 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 2.44 % change on previous year | 0.8239 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 4.33 % change on previous year | 1.44 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 4.96 % change on previous year | 0.8392 % change on previous year | 4.12 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.8597 % change on previous year | 1 % change on previous year | 0.1452 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.46 % change on previous year | 5.29 % change on previous year | 3.83 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 11.64 % change on previous year against 2.02 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 9.62 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 9th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.