Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

Botswana
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0 kt per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
160th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
159th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Botswana, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 159th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 kt per person 0 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Botswana
1970s 0.0006 kt per person 0 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Botswana
1980s 0.0005 kt per person 0 kt per person 0.0005 kt per person Botswana
1990s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Botswana or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 kt per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
Botswana ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 159th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/">Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.