Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
-0.1015 % change on previous year
in 2023
Libya
-0.0911 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
113th
Libya rank
112th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Libya
-30-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports -0.0911 % change on previous year against -0.1015 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0104 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Libya ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 113th and Libya ranks 112th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Libya Difference Ahead
1960s -2.32 % change on previous year -1.43 % change on previous year 0.8877 % change on previous year Libya
1970s -1.27 % change on previous year -8.8 % change on previous year 7.52 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1980s -0.2926 % change on previous year 0.0013 % change on previous year 0.294 % change on previous year Libya
1990s -1.67 % change on previous year 0.0998 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year Libya
2000s -0.734 % change on previous year 0.4613 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year Libya
2010s -1.72 % change on previous year 0.1228 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year Libya
2020s -0.2639 % change on previous year -0.0818 % change on previous year 0.1821 % change on previous year Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Libya?
Libya, at -0.0911 % change on previous year against -0.1015 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Libya?
0.0104 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Libya?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Libya rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 113th and Libya ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/libya/">Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 12,901 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.