Which has higher raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp, Bahamas or New Caledonia?

New Caledonia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2023.

What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp between Bahamas and New Caledonia?

0 t per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP (milk unit GDP)

Bahamas

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2023

New Caledonia

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Bahamas rank

161st

New Caledonia rank

160th

Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP (milk unit GDP) over time

Bahamas
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Bahamas, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bahamas ranks 161st and New Caledonia ranks 160th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bahamas	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1970s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1980s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Bahamas
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp, Bahamas or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp between Bahamas and New Caledonia?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and New Caledonia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — production, per unit of gdp?: Bahamas ranks 161st and New Caledonia ranks 160th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-production-per-unit-of-gdp-2/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-production-per-unit-of-gdp-2/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/">Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 164 places, 8,742 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.