Albania vs Eswatini: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Albania
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 161 ha against 0 ha in Albania, a difference of 161 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 134 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,791 ha | 2,335 ha | 1,456 ha | Albania |
| 1970s | 4,123 ha | 1,809 ha | 2,314 ha | Albania |
| 1980s | 3,440 ha | 635.7 ha | 2,804 ha | Albania |
| 1990s | 696.67 ha | 269.17 ha | 427.5 ha | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Albania or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 161 ha against 0 ha in Albania as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Albania and Eswatini?
- 161 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1995.
- How do Albania and Eswatini rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Albania ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).