Ecuador vs USSR: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Ecuador
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 599,400 ha against 398,762 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 200,638 ha.
That makes USSR's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 28th and USSR ranks 26th of 134 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 106,533 ha | 217,889 ha | 111,356 ha | USSR |
| 1970s | 97,841 ha | 487,800 ha | 389,959 ha | USSR |
| 1980s | 184,238 ha | 656,310 ha | 472,072 ha | USSR |
| 1990s | 238,110 ha | 606,700 ha | 368,590 ha | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Ecuador or USSR?
- USSR, at 599,400 ha against 398,762 ha in Ecuador as of 1991.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Ecuador and USSR?
- 200,638 ha, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Ecuador and USSR rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and USSR ranks 26th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).