El Salvador vs Sudan (former): Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- El Salvador
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7,068 ha against 6,720 ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 348 ha.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 86th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15,847 ha | 1,539 ha | 14,308 ha | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 13,005 ha | 7,370 ha | 5,634 ha | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 14,006 ha | 4,192 ha | 9,814 ha | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 13,423 ha | 2,703 ha | 10,720 ha | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 4,891 ha | 6,418 ha | 1,527 ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 4,794 ha | 6,560 ha | 1,766 ha | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, El Salvador or Sudan (former)?
- El Salvador, at 7,068 ha against 6,720 ha in Sudan (former) as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between El Salvador and Sudan (former)?
- 348 ha, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do El Salvador and Sudan (former) rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- El Salvador ranks 86th and Sudan (former) ranks 87th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).