Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 85,459 ha against 63,158 ha in Mexico, a difference of 22,301 ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 56th and Mexico ranks 59th of 134 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90,700 ha | 87,501 ha | 3,199 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 79,363 ha | 61,357 ha | 18,006 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 96,609 ha | 38,864 ha | 57,746 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 96,714 ha | 40,605 ha | 56,108 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2030s | 91,406 ha | 53,057 ha | 38,349 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2050s | 85,459 ha | 63,158 ha | 22,301 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Kazakhstan or Mexico?
- Kazakhstan, at 85,459 ha against 63,158 ha in Mexico as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 22,301 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Kazakhstan ranks 56th and Mexico ranks 59th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).