Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Rice — Area harvested

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4.99 million ha
in 2050
Micronesia (Federated States of)
92 ha
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
16th

Rice — Area harvested over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
02.0M4.0M6.0M196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4.99 million ha against 92 ha in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 4.99 million ha.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 16th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
1990s 3.43 million ha 81.2 ha 3.43 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 3.68 million ha 87.8 ha 3.68 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 4.50 million ha 94.9 ha 4.50 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 5.07 million ha 98.5 ha 5.07 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 4.50 million ha 93 ha 4.50 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 4.99 million ha 92 ha 4.99 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — area harvested, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4.99 million ha against 92 ha in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
4.99 million ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for rice — area harvested?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 16th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Rice — Area harvested</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).