Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Area harvested

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4.99 million ha
in 2050
Pakistan
2.68 million ha
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Pakistan rank
13th

Rice — Area harvested over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4.99 million ha against 2.68 million ha in Pakistan, a difference of 2.31 million ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times Pakistan's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 2.43 million ha 1.38 million ha 1.05 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 2.55 million ha 1.70 million ha 852,170 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 2.65 million ha 1.99 million ha 656,911 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 3.21 million ha 2.22 million ha 996,118 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 3.68 million ha 2.53 million ha 1.15 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 4.50 million ha 2.71 million ha 1.78 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 5.07 million ha 3.37 million ha 1.70 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 4.50 million ha 2.69 million ha 1.81 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 4.99 million ha 2.68 million ha 2.31 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — area harvested, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4.99 million ha against 2.68 million ha in Pakistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
2.31 million ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for rice — area harvested?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Area harvested</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).