Oceania vs USSR: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Oceania
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 599,400 ha against 120,415 ha in Oceania, a difference of 478,985 ha.
That makes USSR's figure about 5.0 times Oceania's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 29th and USSR ranks 26th of 32 groups.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,784 ha | 217,889 ha | 181,105 ha | USSR |
| 1970s | 78,777 ha | 487,800 ha | 409,023 ha | USSR |
| 1980s | 120,280 ha | 656,310 ha | 536,030 ha | USSR |
| 1990s | 110,104 ha | 606,700 ha | 496,596 ha | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Oceania or USSR?
- USSR, at 599,400 ha against 120,415 ha in Oceania as of 1991.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Oceania and USSR?
- 478,985 ha, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Oceania and USSR rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Oceania ranks 29th and USSR ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).