Peru vs USSR: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Peru
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 599,400 ha against 504,058 ha in Peru, a difference of 95,342 ha.
That makes USSR's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 27th and USSR ranks 26th of 134 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 87,798 ha | 217,889 ha | 130,091 ha | USSR |
| 1970s | 127,507 ha | 487,800 ha | 360,293 ha | USSR |
| 1980s | 188,613 ha | 656,310 ha | 467,697 ha | USSR |
| 1990s | 171,553 ha | 606,700 ha | 435,147 ha | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Peru or USSR?
- USSR, at 599,400 ha against 504,058 ha in Peru as of 1991.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Peru and USSR?
- 95,342 ha, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Peru and USSR rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Peru ranks 27th and USSR ranks 26th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).