Russian Federation vs Uganda: Rice — Area harvested
Rice — Area harvested over time
- Russian Federation
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 304,455 ha against 261,363 ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 43,092 ha.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 182,290 ha | 57,875 ha | 124,415 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 149,576 ha | 95,500 ha | 54,076 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 194,347 ha | 115,556 ha | 78,792 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 184,329 ha | 217,750 ha | 33,421 ha | Uganda |
| 2030s | 217,165 ha | 214,208 ha | 2,957 ha | Russian Federation |
| 2050s | 261,363 ha | 304,455 ha | 43,092 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, Russian Federation or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 304,455 ha against 261,363 ha in Russian Federation as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 43,092 ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Russian Federation and Uganda rank globally for rice — area harvested?
- Russian Federation ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).