Australia vs Cuba: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual

Australia
-16.56 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba
-16.21 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
115th
Cuba rank
114th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time

  • Australia
  • Cuba
0200400600800196219922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports -16.21 % change on previous year against -16.56 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 0.35 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 38 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia ranks 115th and Cuba ranks 114th of 130 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 6.81 % change on previous year 7.79 % change on previous year 0.976 % change on previous year Cuba
1970s 13.49 % change on previous year 3.16 % change on previous year 10.34 % change on previous year Australia
1980s 1.34 % change on previous year 1.44 % change on previous year 0.0964 % change on previous year Cuba
1990s 5.7 % change on previous year 4.6 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year Australia
2000s 9.67 % change on previous year 3.82 % change on previous year 5.85 % change on previous year Australia
2010s 50.19 % change on previous year -4.15 % change on previous year 54.34 % change on previous year Australia
2020s 197.08 % change on previous year -20.91 % change on previous year 217.99 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Australia or Cuba?
Cuba, at -16.21 % change on previous year against -16.56 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Australia and Cuba?
0.35 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Australia ranks 115th and Cuba ranks 114th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cuba: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/cuba/">Australia vs Cuba: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,307 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.