Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual
Australia
-16.56 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
-15.49 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
115th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
113th
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time
- Australia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports -15.49 % change on previous year against -16.56 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 1.07 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 41 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 115th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 113th of 130 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.81 % change on previous year | 14.61 % change on previous year | 7.8 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1970s | 13.49 % change on previous year | 8.27 % change on previous year | 5.23 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1980s | 1.34 % change on previous year | 5.25 % change on previous year | 3.91 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1990s | 5.7 % change on previous year | 2.84 % change on previous year | 2.86 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2000s | 9.67 % change on previous year | 9.78 % change on previous year | 0.1173 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 50.19 % change on previous year | 4.27 % change on previous year | 45.92 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2020s | 197.08 % change on previous year | 4.6 % change on previous year | 192.48 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at -15.49 % change on previous year against -16.56 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 1.07 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
- Australia ranks 115th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 113th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.