China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1991
Zimbabwe
-79.51 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
126th
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -79.51 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 20.49 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 130 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -3.65 % change on previous year | 15.4 % change on previous year | 19.05 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | -32.49 % change on previous year | -11.31 % change on previous year | 21.18 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | -29.01 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | 31.33 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | -50 % change on previous year | -0.7389 % change on previous year | 49.26 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, China, Hong Kong SAR or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -79.51 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
- 20.49 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.