Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual

Eswatini
0.9434 % change on previous year
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.9898 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eswatini rank
52nd
Turkmenistan rank
50th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time

  • Eswatini
  • Turkmenistan
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.9898 % change on previous year against 0.9434 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0464 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Eswatini ranks 52nd and Turkmenistan ranks 50th of 130 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s -6.77 % change on previous year 4.99 % change on previous year 11.76 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 20.55 % change on previous year 6.66 % change on previous year 13.89 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 6.32 % change on previous year 25.84 % change on previous year 19.52 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2020s -0.6012 % change on previous year -1.85 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Eswatini or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.9898 % change on previous year against 0.9434 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
0.0464 % change on previous year, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Turkmenistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Eswatini ranks 52nd and Turkmenistan ranks 50th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/turkmenistan/">Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,307 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.