Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual

Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Zimbabwe
-79.51 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
126th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -79.51 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 20.49 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 130 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 548.39 % change on previous year 8.7 % change on previous year 539.69 % change on previous year Mauritius
1970s -16.9 % change on previous year -11.31 % change on previous year 5.58 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 95.75 % change on previous year 2.33 % change on previous year 93.42 % change on previous year Mauritius
1990s -55.83 % change on previous year -0.0917 % change on previous year 55.74 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -9.32 % change on previous year 6.06 % change on previous year 15.38 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -100 % change on previous year -87.5 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -79.51 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
20.49 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Mauritius ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,307 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.