Oceania vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual

Oceania
-17.31 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sudan (former)
5 % change on previous year
in 2011
Oceania rank
34th
Sudan (former) rank
31st

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time

  • Oceania
  • Sudan (former)
0200400196219922023

How they compare

Sudan (former) currently reports 5 % change on previous year against -17.31 % change on previous year in Oceania, a difference of 22.31 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Oceania ahead.

Oceania ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 31st of 34 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 2 and Sudan (former) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 3.88 % change on previous year 61.59 % change on previous year 57.71 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
1970s 11.33 % change on previous year 13.71 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
1980s 1.15 % change on previous year -20.89 % change on previous year 22.04 % change on previous year Oceania
1990s 4.6 % change on previous year 40.55 % change on previous year 35.95 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
2000s -5.96 % change on previous year -0.0492 % change on previous year 5.91 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
2010s 163.3 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year 160.03 % change on previous year Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Oceania or Sudan (former)?
Sudan (former), at 5 % change on previous year against -17.31 % change on previous year in Oceania as of 2011.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Oceania and Sudan (former)?
22.31 % change on previous year, with Sudan (former) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan (former)?
50 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2011.
How do Oceania and Sudan (former) rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Oceania ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 31st of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/oceania/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/oceania/sudan-former/">Oceania vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,307 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.