Saudi Arabia vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual

Saudi Arabia
-1.18 % change on previous year
in 2023
South Africa
-0.7456 % change on previous year
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
75th
South Africa rank
72nd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • South Africa
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports -0.7456 % change on previous year against -1.18 % change on previous year in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.4344 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1962 it was South Africa ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 75th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 130 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 5.82 % change on previous year -2.45 % change on previous year 8.27 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia
1970s 24.62 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 24.62 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia
1980s -88.93 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 88.93 % change on previous year South Africa
2010s 41.76 % change on previous year -0.8572 % change on previous year 42.62 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia
2020s 11.56 % change on previous year -0.6694 % change on previous year 12.23 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Saudi Arabia or South Africa?
South Africa, at -0.7456 % change on previous year against -1.18 % change on previous year in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Saudi Arabia and South Africa?
0.4344 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Saudi Arabia and South Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Saudi Arabia ranks 75th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/saudi-arabia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/saudi-arabia/south-africa/">Saudi Arabia vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,307 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.