Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita

Mauritius
0 t per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 t per person
in 2023
Mauritius rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0 t per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita?
Mauritius ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.