Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita

Papua New Guinea
0 t per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 t per person
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.9 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 t per person 0.0001 t per person 0.0001 t per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0 t per person 0 t per person 0 t per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0 t per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.