Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square

Trinidad and Tobago
0.0352 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0366 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago rank
68th
Zambia rank
67th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0366 t per square kilometre against 0.0352 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0014 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th and Zambia ranks 67th of 120 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4747 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.4746 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.6014 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.6001 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.2329 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre 0.2266 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.4375 t per square kilometre 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.429 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.2412 t per square kilometre 0.0095 t per square kilometre 0.2318 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.2199 t per square kilometre 0.0203 t per square kilometre 0.1996 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0428 t per square kilometre 0.0292 t per square kilometre 0.0135 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square, Trinidad and Tobago or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0366 t per square kilometre against 0.0352 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square between Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
0.0014 t per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th and Zambia ranks 67th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zambia/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.