Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate

Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Zimbabwe
-81.25 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -81.25 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 18.75 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 130 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s -15 % change on previous year -11.16 % change on previous year 3.84 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s -100 % change on previous year -42.86 % change on previous year 57.14 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -8.1 % change on previous year 10.77 % change on previous year 18.87 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -81.25 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
18.75 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2018.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate?
Mauritius ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,227 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.