Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.1697 kt
in 2050
Malawi
0.1711 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
50th
Malawi rank
48th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Malawi
00.10.20.3196120052050

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.1711 kt against 0.1697 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0014 kt.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 7 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0382 kt 0.0154 kt 0.0228 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.1007 kt 0.059 kt 0.0416 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.1591 kt 0.0357 kt 0.1234 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.1956 kt 0.0518 kt 0.1438 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.1113 kt 0.0791 kt 0.0321 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.0944 kt 0.0939 kt 0.0005 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.0612 kt 0.1128 kt 0.0516 kt Malawi
2030s 0.1394 kt 0.1281 kt 0.0113 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.1697 kt 0.1711 kt 0.0014 kt Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.1711 kt against 0.1697 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
0.0014 kt, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Malawi rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/">Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).