China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.0002 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
110th
Eswatini rank
108th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0002 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 110th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.014 kt 0.0035 kt 0.0106 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0037 kt 0.0027 kt 0.001 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0 kt 0.0009 kt 0.0009 kt Eswatini
1990s 0 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0003 kt Eswatini
2000s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini
2010s 0 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0004 kt Eswatini
2020s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Eswatini
2030s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini
2050s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0002 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
0.0002 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 110th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).