China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
0.0005 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
110th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Papua New Guinea
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0005 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 110th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.014 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0133 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0037 kt 0.0007 kt 0.003 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0004 kt Papua New Guinea
1990s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Papua New Guinea
2000s 0 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0006 kt Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0006 kt Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0006 kt Papua New Guinea
2030s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Papua New Guinea
2050s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0005 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea?
0.0005 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 110th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/papua-new-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).