Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues

Eswatini
0.0002 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
0.0005 kt
in 2050
Eswatini rank
108th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Eswatini
  • Papua New Guinea
00.0010.0020.0030.004196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0.0002 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0003 kt.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0035 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0028 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.0027 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0019 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.0009 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0005 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.0003 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0003 kt Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0002 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0004 kt Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0004 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0002 kt Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0005 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0001 kt Papua New Guinea
2030s 0.0002 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0003 kt Papua New Guinea
2050s 0.0002 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0003 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Eswatini or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0005 kt against 0.0002 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
0.0003 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Papua New Guinea rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Eswatini ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/">Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).