Americas vs Kazakhstan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Americas
2.46 % change on previous year
in 2023
Kazakhstan
14.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Americas rank
14th
Kazakhstan rank
17th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Americas
  • Kazakhstan
-20-100102030196219922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 14.71 % change on previous year against 2.46 % change on previous year in Americas, a difference of 12.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 6.0 times Americas's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Americas ahead.

Americas ranks 14th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 34 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Americas averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1249 % change on previous year -6.82 % change on previous year 6.94 % change on previous year Americas
2000s -0.8794 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year 3.5 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2010s -2.34 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year 4.18 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2020s 0.256 % change on previous year 0.3674 % change on previous year 0.1114 % change on previous year Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Americas or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 14.71 % change on previous year against 2.46 % change on previous year in Americas as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Americas and Kazakhstan?
12.25 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Americas and Kazakhstan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Americas ranks 14th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Americas vs Kazakhstan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/americas/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/americas/kazakhstan/">Americas vs Kazakhstan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.