Annex I countries vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Annex I countries
7.99 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sudan (former)
50 % change on previous year
in 2011
Annex I countries rank
6th
Sudan (former) rank
3rd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Annex I countries
  • Sudan (former)
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Sudan (former) currently reports 50 % change on previous year against 7.99 % change on previous year in Annex I countries, a difference of 42.01 % change on previous year.

That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 6.3 times Annex I countries's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Annex I countries ahead.

Annex I countries ranks 6th and Sudan (former) ranks 3rd of 34 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Annex I countries averaged higher in 2 and Sudan (former) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Annex I countries Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 1.44 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 51.44 % change on previous year Annex I countries
1970s -0.142 % change on previous year 20.17 % change on previous year 20.31 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
1980s -1.28 % change on previous year -23.33 % change on previous year 22.06 % change on previous year Annex I countries
1990s -0.6314 % change on previous year 42.86 % change on previous year 43.49 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
2000s -0.9138 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.9138 % change on previous year Sudan (former)
2010s -0.7722 % change on previous year 25 % change on previous year 25.77 % change on previous year Sudan (former)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Annex I countries or Sudan (former)?
Sudan (former), at 50 % change on previous year against 7.99 % change on previous year in Annex I countries as of 2011.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Annex I countries and Sudan (former)?
42.01 % change on previous year, with Sudan (former) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Annex I countries and Sudan (former)?
41 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2011.
How do Annex I countries and Sudan (former) rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Annex I countries ranks 6th and Sudan (former) ranks 3rd of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Annex I countries vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/annex-i-countries/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/annex-i-countries/sudan-former/">Annex I countries vs Sudan (former): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.