Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Australia
-16.67 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
-15.54 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
104th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
103rd
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Australia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports -15.54 % change on previous year against -16.67 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 1.13 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 42 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Australia ranks 104th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 103rd of 121 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.38 % change on previous year | 14.06 % change on previous year | 7.68 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1970s | 13.35 % change on previous year | 8.21 % change on previous year | 5.14 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1980s | 1.3 % change on previous year | 5.26 % change on previous year | 3.96 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1990s | 5.76 % change on previous year | 2.87 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2000s | 8.51 % change on previous year | 9.78 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 49.83 % change on previous year | 4.26 % change on previous year | 45.56 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2020s | 185.29 % change on previous year | 4.61 % change on previous year | 180.68 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at -15.54 % change on previous year against -16.67 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 1.13 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Australia ranks 104th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 103rd of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.