Chile vs Uganda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Chile
-12.5 % change on previous year
in 2023
Uganda
-13.48 % change on previous year
in 2023
Chile rank
100th
Uganda rank
101st

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Chile
  • Uganda
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports -12.5 % change on previous year against -13.48 % change on previous year in Uganda, a difference of 0.98 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.

Chile ranks 100th and Uganda ranks 101st of 121 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s -7.45 % change on previous year 25 % change on previous year 32.45 % change on previous year Uganda
1970s 16.89 % change on previous year 14.54 % change on previous year 2.35 % change on previous year Chile
1980s 0.8413 % change on previous year 12.69 % change on previous year 11.85 % change on previous year Uganda
1990s -8.23 % change on previous year 8.24 % change on previous year 16.47 % change on previous year Uganda
2000s 6.28 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Chile
2010s 2.2 % change on previous year 9.04 % change on previous year 6.84 % change on previous year Uganda
2020s -8.4 % change on previous year 4.07 % change on previous year 12.48 % change on previous year Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Chile or Uganda?
Chile, at -12.5 % change on previous year against -13.48 % change on previous year in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Chile and Uganda?
0.98 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Chile ranks 100th and Uganda ranks 101st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uganda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/chile/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/chile/uganda/">Chile vs Uganda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.