China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1977
Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 1981
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
111th
Eswatini rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
-100-50050100196219711981

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 111th of 121 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1970s -26.19 % change on previous year -14.29 % change on previous year 11.9 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 1977.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
15 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1977.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.