China, Hong Kong SAR vs Melanesia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1977
Melanesia
-50 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
111th
Melanesia rank
110th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Melanesia
-100-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports -50 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 50 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Melanesia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Melanesia ranks 110th of 121 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Melanesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Melanesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s -22.92 % change on previous year 4.79 % change on previous year 27.71 % change on previous year Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at -50 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Melanesia?
50 % change on previous year, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Melanesia?
16 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1977.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Melanesia rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Melanesia ranks 110th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Melanesia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/melanesia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Melanesia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.