China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1977
Zimbabwe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Zimbabwe
-100-50050100196219922022

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 121 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 9.72 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 9.72 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s -20.83 % change on previous year -25 % change on previous year 4.17 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Zimbabwe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 1977.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 1973.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.