Comoros vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Comoros
-100 % change on previous year
in 2009
South Africa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Comoros rank
111th
South Africa rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Comoros
  • South Africa
-100-50050196219852009

How they compare

Comoros currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1962 it was South Africa ahead.

Comoros ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.67 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year Comoros
1970s 5.83 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 5.83 % change on previous year Comoros
1980s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1990s -5.56 % change on previous year -22.22 % change on previous year 16.67 % change on previous year Comoros
2000s 0 % change on previous year -75 % change on previous year 75 % change on previous year Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Comoros or South Africa?
Comoros, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa as of 2009.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Comoros and South Africa?
0 % change on previous year, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and South Africa?
41 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2008.
How do Comoros and South Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Comoros ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/comoros/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/comoros/south-africa/">Comoros vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.