Costa Rica vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Costa Rica
-40 % change on previous year
in 2023
South Africa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Costa Rica rank
109th
South Africa rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • South Africa
-100-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports -40 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa, a difference of 60 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 109th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9312 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.9312 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1970s 8.77 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 8.77 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1980s -4.45 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 4.45 % change on previous year South Africa
1990s 6.05 % change on previous year -22.22 % change on previous year 28.27 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2000s -0.6535 % change on previous year -75 % change on previous year 74.35 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Costa Rica or South Africa?
Costa Rica, at -40 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Costa Rica and South Africa?
60 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and South Africa?
41 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2008.
How do Costa Rica and South Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 109th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/south-africa/">Costa Rica vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.