Eswatini vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 1981
South Africa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Eswatini rank
111th
South Africa rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • South Africa
-100-80-60-40-200196219852008

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 19 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1970s -11.11 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 11.11 % change on previous year South Africa
1980s -50 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 50 % change on previous year South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Eswatini or South Africa?
Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in South Africa as of 1981.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Eswatini and South Africa?
0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Africa?
19 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1981.
How do Eswatini and South Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/south-africa/">Eswatini vs South Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.