Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 1981
Trinidad and Tobago
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Eswatini rank
111th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-100-50050100196219902018

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Eswatini ranks 111th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 121 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1970s -11.11 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year 12.96 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1980s -50 % change on previous year -75 % change on previous year 25 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Eswatini or Trinidad and Tobago?
Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago as of 1981.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
19 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1981.
How do Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 111th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/">Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.