Fiji vs Romania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Fiji
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Romania
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Fiji rank
43rd
Romania rank
43rd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Fiji
  • Romania
-100-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Romania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 43rd of 121 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Romania Difference Ahead
1960s -1.46 % change on previous year 17.13 % change on previous year 18.59 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 2.5 % change on previous year -1.77 % change on previous year 4.27 % change on previous year Fiji
1980s 4.17 % change on previous year 8.55 % change on previous year 4.38 % change on previous year Romania
1990s -7.83 % change on previous year -20.27 % change on previous year 12.44 % change on previous year Fiji
2000s 0 % change on previous year 18.06 % change on previous year 18.06 % change on previous year Romania
2010s -16.67 % change on previous year -2.22 % change on previous year 14.44 % change on previous year Romania
2020s 0 % change on previous year -20.83 % change on previous year 20.83 % change on previous year Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Fiji or Romania?
Fiji, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Fiji and Romania?
0 % change on previous year, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Romania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Fiji ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 43rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Romania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/fiji/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/fiji/romania/">Fiji vs Romania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.