Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Guatemala
100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Northern America
31.66 % change on previous year
in 2023
Guatemala rank
2nd
Northern America rank
2nd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Guatemala
  • Northern America
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 100 % change on previous year against 31.66 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 68.34 % change on previous year.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 3.2 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 40 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 2nd and Northern America ranks 2nd of 121 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Northern America in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 13.75 % change on previous year 4.05 % change on previous year 9.7 % change on previous year Guatemala
1970s 4.31 % change on previous year 4.01 % change on previous year 0.3 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 5.37 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year 4.26 % change on previous year Guatemala
1990s 1.64 % change on previous year 3.13 % change on previous year 1.48 % change on previous year Northern America
2000s -1.67 % change on previous year -0.8311 % change on previous year 0.8356 % change on previous year Northern America
2010s -2.5 % change on previous year -0.5293 % change on previous year 1.97 % change on previous year Northern America
2020s 25 % change on previous year 5.67 % change on previous year 19.33 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Guatemala or Northern America?
Guatemala, at 100 % change on previous year against 31.66 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Guatemala and Northern America?
68.34 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Northern America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Northern America rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Guatemala ranks 2nd and Northern America ranks 2nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/northern-america/">Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.