Kazakhstan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Kazakhstan
14.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1.95 % change on previous year
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
17th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
15th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
-20-100102030196219922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 14.71 % change on previous year against 1.95 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 12.76 % change on previous year.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 7.5 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s -6.82 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year 8.48 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 2.62 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year 0.8173 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2010s 1.84 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year 0.7749 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2020s 0.3674 % change on previous year 1.68 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Kazakhstan, at 14.71 % change on previous year against 1.95 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
12.76 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 15th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Kazakhstan vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.