Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Kazakhstan
14.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritania
17.86 % change on previous year
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
17th
Mauritania rank
14th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
-100-50050100197219972023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 17.86 % change on previous year against 14.71 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.15 % change on previous year.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 14th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -6.82 % change on previous year 11.09 % change on previous year 17.91 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s 2.62 % change on previous year -2.55 % change on previous year 5.16 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2010s 1.84 % change on previous year 21.65 % change on previous year 19.81 % change on previous year Mauritania
2020s 0.3674 % change on previous year 7.85 % change on previous year 7.49 % change on previous year Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 17.86 % change on previous year against 14.71 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
3.15 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 14th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/mauritania/">Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.